ComplianceGPT Deep Dive
Jul 21–24 · Final experiments + results analysis · Deliverable: poster draft + 2-page write-up draft
Learning Goals
- Complete all experimental runs and have a complete results table
- Understand the full pipeline end-to-end (both extraction and explanation layers)
- Draft a research poster from your results
- Write a 2-page research summary covering your work
Day 1 — Monday, July 21: Error Analysis Deep Dive
Systematic Error Analysis
- Filter all wrong rows:
df[df["verdict"] != df["ground_truth"]] - Group by error type: role error, purpose error, hallucination, format fail
- Measure error rate per HIPAA category (LE, judicial, TPO, research...)
- Look for patterns: does the same model fail on the same types?
The LLM Extraction Layer (Black Box Boundary)
- LLM1: extracts structured JSON from scenario text
- LLM2: generates natural language explanation for the verdict
- Postprocessing: normalizes roles, injects oracle predicates
- Compliance engine: applies HIPAA rules (you don't see the internals)
- Your research: understand extraction quality, not engine internals
What extraction fields matter most?
Rank the fields by their impact on verdict accuracy: sender_role and purpose together account for ~70% of extraction errors. has_authorization booleans account for most of the rest. Understanding this priority order will help you write a clear "most impactful finding" for your poster.
Run your final experiments today. All data collection should be complete by end of Day 1 so you have Tue–Fri to analyze and write. Finalize your results CSV. Compute your key metric(s). Make at least 1 table and 1 chart.
Day 2 — Wednesday, July 23: Poster Draft Workshop
Poster Structure (6-foot rule)
Your poster will be viewed by visitors who walk past. They spend 30 seconds on first pass. Structure for that scan:
- Title — one clear claim or question (large, top)
- Problem + Motivation — why does this matter? (left column)
- Method — what did you do? One diagram helps
- Results — the key table or chart (center, large)
- Conclusion — one sentence takeaway (right bottom)
Design Rules
- Minimum font: 24pt body, 36pt headers, 56pt title
- Maximum text per panel: 5 sentences. Cut the rest.
- Every figure needs a caption with 1 takeaway sentence
- Use your main result as the visual anchor — big, centered
- Tools: PowerPoint, Google Slides, Canva, LaTeX beamerposter
- Size: 48×36 inches (standard research poster)
Sketch a poster layout on paper or in slides. Bring it to Friday's session. It doesn't need to be polished — just have the structure: title, boxes for each section, placeholder for your main result figure.
Day 3 — Friday, July 25: 2-Page Write-Up Workshop
2-Page Research Summary Structure
- Introduction (3–4 sentences): what problem, why it matters, what you did
- Background (3–4 sentences): what's already known, what gap you fill
- Method (4–6 sentences): experiments, data, metrics — enough to reproduce
- Results (4–6 sentences): main table or figure, your key finding
- Discussion (3–4 sentences): what does it mean, why, what's next
- References (3–5 citations): papers you built on
Writing rule: claim first, evidence second
Every paragraph starts with a claim: "Few-shot prompting increased extraction accuracy by 8%." Then the evidence: "Table 2 shows accuracy improved from 74% to 82% across 137 scenarios when 3 examples were added to the prompt." Then analysis: "The improvement was largest for law enforcement scenarios (from 62% to 79%), suggesting few-shot examples help most when the exception category is rare in training data."
Week 5 Deliverable
Due: Friday, July 25 (end of day)
1. Poster draft — Does not need to be final. Must have: title, all sections sketched, your main result visible (even as a rough table). Submit as PDF or Google Slides link.
2. 2-page write-up draft — Does not need to be polished. Must have all 5 sections (intro, background, method, results, discussion). I will give detailed written feedback by Monday morning.
3. Results CSV — Final, complete experiment results in results/[yourname]_final.csv.
Recommended Reading This Week
- Keshav — "How to Read a Paper" (3-pass method) — Apply this to your own write-up: would a reader understand it in 3 passes?
- ComplianceGPT paper draft — Read it again now that you understand the pipeline. Notice how results tables are structured and how claims connect to evidence.